Received 02.07.2025, Revised 19.11.2025, Accepted 23.12.2025

Architecture of digital innovations as a determinant of strategic resilience of an enterprise

Iryna Yepifanova, Tetiana Nechyporenko

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to increase the strategic resilience of enterprises in the context of digital transformation, where the architecture of digital innovations is a key factor in adaptability and competitiveness. The aim of the study was to substantiate the role of the architecture of digital innovations as a determinant of the strategic resilience of enterprises. The research methodology was based on the use of systemic-structural and comparative analysis methods to identify the parameters of digital architecture, as well as economic-mathematical modelling to develop a matrix of its functional role in ensuring the adaptive potential of business. It is accepted that in conditions of growing turbulence of exogenous factors and digital transformation of the economy, the architecture of digital innovations is a key determinant of the strategic resilience of an enterprise. The conceptual parameters of digital architecture (technological basis, adaptability, predictability) and their impact on the transformation of traditional management models are considered. The dynamics of the integration of digital components into the operational activities of Ukrainian enterprises are analysed, which has made it possible to identify a correlation between the level of technological potential and the speed of business recovery after crisis shocks. It has been established that the fragmentary implementation of solutions, cyber risks and the lack of digital competencies are destabilising factors that negate the strategic potential of digital architecture. Based on the analysis, a phased approach to the formation of a holistic architecture and a matrix of its functional role in ensuring the resilience of economic entities are proposed. It has been proven that only a comprehensive approach to combining technological drivers with strategic development goals can ensure the long-term adaptive stability and competitiveness of an enterprise in the global digital space. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed architectural approach and innovative tools by senior managers, crisis managers and digital development specialists to design flexible management strategies that ensure high resilience of enterprises in critical conditions

cyber resilience; technological drivers; adaptive management; digitalisation; business model reconfiguration
86-96
Yepifanova, I., & Nechyporenko, T. (2025). Architecture of digital innovations as a determinant of strategic resilience of an enterprise. Innovation and Sustainability, 5(4), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.31649/vis/4.2025.86

References

  1. Akib, H., Furkan, F., Sumarno, S., Budidarma, A., Salam, R., & Hadi, S. (2022). Business resilience in the digital transformation era. Pinisi Discretion Review, 6(1), 95-102. doi: 10.26858/pdr.v6i1.37708.
  2. Awad, J.A.R., & Martin‑Rojas, R. (2024). Digital transformation influence on organizational resilience through innovation capability. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), article number 69. doi: 10.1186/s13731-024-00405-4.
  3. Beverungen, D., Hess, T., Köster, A., Lehrer, C. (2022). From private digital platforms to public data spaces: Implications for the digital transformation. Electronic Markets, 32, 493-501. doi: 10.1007/s12525-022-00553-z.
  4. Biluha, M. (2025). Innovative business development under digital transformation and crisis: Potential, barriers, and prospects for Ukraine. Marketing and Digital Technologies, 9(3), 136-157. doi: 10.15276/mdt.9.3.2025.10.
  5. Cui, J. (2025). Empirical analysis of digital innovations impact on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of GAI technology. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.01041.
  6. Fletcher, G., & Griffiths, M. (2020). Digital transformation during a lockdown. International Journal of Information Management, 55, article number 102185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185.
  7. Ivanova, N. (2024). Digital transformation of Ukraine: Impact on the economy, quality of life and achievement of sustainable development goals. Economics of Systems Development, 6(1), 100-111. doi: 10.32782/2707-8019/2024-1-9.
  8. Kolodiziev, O., Shcherbak, V., Kostyshyna, T., Krupka, M., Riabovolyk, T., Androshchuk, I., & Kravchuk, N. (2024). Digital transformation as a tool for creating an inclusive economy in Ukraine during wartime. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 440-457, doi: 10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.34.
  9. KPMG Ukraine. (2024). Ukrainian business through the eyes of managers and executives 2024. Retrieved from https://kpmg.com/ua/uk/home/insights/2024/11/kpmg-ceo-outlook-2024.html.
  10. Kula, R.G., & Treude, C. (2022). In war and peace: The impact of world politics on software ecosystems. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.01393.
  11. Kuzior, A., Pidorycheva, I., Liashenko, V., Shevtsova, H., & Shvets, N. (2022). Assessment of national innovation ecosystems of the EU countries and Ukraine in interests of sustainable development. Sustainability, 14, article number 8487. doi: 10.3390/su14148487.
  12. Masaev, S.N., Vingert, V.V., Bogdanov, A.V., & Salal, Y.K. (2025). A strategic planning of a digital copy (an enterprise) as a task of control a dynamic system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1679, article number 032010. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1679/3/032010.
  13. National Bank of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/.
  14. Parkhuts, Y.D., & Ohdanska, O.D. (2025). Ensuring the competitiveness of an enterprise based on digital transformation models. European Journal of Management Issues, 33(2), 75-87. doi: 10.15421/192507.
  15. Pizniak, D., & Turchina, S. (2023). The use of digital technologies in the process of post‑war reconstruction of Ukraine. Modern Economics, 40, 44-51. doi: 10.31521/modecon.V40(2023)‑06.
  16. PwC Ukraine. (n.d.). Banking sector. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/ua/uk/industry/banking.html.
  17. Savras, I.Z., & Fedynets, N.I. (2023). Digitalization and innovative development of enterprises: Trends, problems and prospects. Herald of LUTE. Economic Sciences, 74, 108-114. doi: 10.32782/2522-1205-2023-74-14.
  18. Strutynska, I., Dmytrotsa, L., Sorokivska, O., & Kozbur, H. (2024). Features of digital development of small and medium business in Ukraine, EU, and G7 countries. In Transformation of business for sustainable future: Research, digitalization and innovation (pp. 411-427). Ternopil: FOP Palyanytsya.
  19. Tkachenko, I. (2024). Resilience of Ukrainian business: How to support production and innovations in the conditions of war. Economic Bulletin of the Dniprovsk State Technical University, 2(9), 125-135. doi: 10.31319/2709-2879.2024iss2(9).319091pp125-135.
  20. Trunina, I., Bilyk, M., & Yakovenko, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence from Industry 5.0 perspective: Threats and challenges. In IEEE 5th international conference on modern electrical and energy system (MEES). Kremenchuk: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/MEES61502.2023.10402468.
  21. Ukrstat. (n.d.). Use of information and communication technologies at enterprises. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.ua/en/datasets/use-information-and-communication-technologies-enterprises.
  22. Voloshchuk, Y., Lavruk, N., Derlytsia, A., Havryliuk, V., & Kulii‑Demianiuk, Y. (2025). The role of public investment in innovative projects during martial law. Economics of Development, 24(1), 45-56. doi: 10.63341/econ/1.2025.45.
  23. Yan, Y. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of enterprise digital transformation. BCP Business & Management, 44, 631-637. doi: 10.54691/bcpbm.v44i.4903.
  24. Zhang, P., & Wang, Y. (2024). Digital transformation: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis from the corporate finance perspective. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5053864.