Institutional shifts in the digital economy: Behavioural and strategic implications for economic governance
Hanna Bazetska, Krystyna MykhailovaThis article examined the institutional transformations induced by the digital economy, with particular emphasis on their behavioural and strategic implications for economic governance. The study aimed to classify new institutional forms that have emerged within digital ecosystems and to analyse their influence on coordination, compliance, and decision-making among economic agents. A conceptual framework was developed on the basis of content analysis, comparative institutional review, and theoretical synthesis, drawing on up-to-date academic and policy sources. The findings showed that traditional regulatory models based on hierarchical authority have been increasingly replaced by algorithmic governance, platform-mediated regulation, and behavioural mechanisms such as nudging and reputational scoring. These mechanisms transformed economic behaviour by fostering conformity, shortening decision cycles, and altering preference formation. Strategic institutional responses included the introduction of digital tools such as e-government platforms, algorithmic audits, and performance dashboards. Public and private institutions displayed varying levels of digital maturity, leading to asymmetrical outcomes in accountability, inclusiveness, and trust. The study produced a typology of institutional strategies and behavioural effects to illustrate the structural and cognitive dimensions of digital institutionalisation. It also explored co-evolutionary dynamics, showing how institutions and behaviours mutually adapt through feedback loops and reflexive governance. The research identified behavioural opacity, decision- making acceleration, and emotional heuristics as key characteristics of digital environments. The practical relevance of the study lies in its value for policymakers, digital system designers, and institutional reformers. The results provide a basis for understanding how governance can remain effective, fair, and legitimate in technologically mediated systems. By integrating institutional theory with behavioural economics, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of governance adaptation in the context of rapid digital transformation
References
- Alibaba group platform governance annual report 2016. (2017). Retrieved from https://alizila.oss-us-west-1.aliyuncs.com/uploads/2017/06/Alibaba-Group-Platform-Governance-Report.pdf.
- Amazon services business solutions agreement. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/G1791.
- Antoniuk, L., Ilnytskyi, D., & Sevastsiuk, A. (Eds.). (2021). The digital economy: The impact of ICT on human capital and formation of future competencies. Kyiv: Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman.
- Balan, O., Gutsul, T., Riabenko, V., Baranovska, O., Polishko, Ya., & Gnatko, D. (2024). Risk assessment in the development of strategy for the use of company’s resource potential under modern conditions. Economics and Business Management, 15(4), 118-138. doi: 10.31548/economics/4.2024.118.
- Bilozubenko, V.S., & Horodnytskyi, R.O. (2021). Digital economy as an environment for developing innovation activity of small businesses. The Problems of Economy, 2(48), 103-110. doi: 10.32983/2222-0712-2021-2-103-110.
- Çetin Er, C., & Özcan, O. (2022). Urban and architectural spatial changes based on technology-adapted users: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, article number 121783. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121783.
- Chen, Z., & Xing, R. (2025). Digital economy, green innovation and high-quality economic development. International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, article number 104029. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104029.
- Dunayev, I., & Kovalenko, M. (2022). New traces of regulation of information platforms and a platform-based economy for the new public good. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(61), 6-24. doi: 10.26565/1684-84892022-2-01.
- Galtsova, O.L. (Ed.). (2021). Digital economy as a factor in economic growth of the state. Kherson: Helvetica Publishing Group.
- Gubernat, T.Ya., Hryhorash, P.L., & Nikolaienko, S.M. (2024). The digital economy as a catalyst for SME development: Innovation and institutionalization. Academic Visions, 30. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10960868.
- Hong, Z., & Xiao, K. (2024). Digital economy structuring for sustainable development: The role of blockchain and artificial intelligence in improving supply chain and reducing negative environmental impacts. Scientific Reports, 14, article number 12345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53760-3.
- Hurzhii, N.M., Nazarova, S.O., & Vasylyna, O.R. (2024). Digital economy and its impact on changing consumer behavior and market strategies: Digital transformations and institutional context. Academic Visions, 30. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10980333.
- Ismoilova, D.S. (2024). Digital economy and its role in global development. Central Asian Journal of Mathematical Theory and Computer Sciences, 5(6), 624-628.
- Kalinin, O. (2024). Investment security in the development of the digital economy. Economics Ecology Socium, 8, 7384. doi: 10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.2-6.
- Kergroach, S. (2021). SMEs going digital: Policy challenges and recommendations. OECD Going Digital Toolkit Notes, 15. doi: 10.1787/c91088a4-en.
- Kozlov, V.V., & Tomashevska, T.V. (2021). Digital economy: Preconditions, threats and prospects. Statistics of Ukraine, 93(2), 58-66. doi: 10.31767/su.2(93)2021.02.06.
- Kozub, V., Shi, X., & Orel, Yu. (2024). Digital economy and its role in shaping an innovative business environment. Economics. Finance. Law, 4, 54-58. doi: 10.37634/efp.2024.4.11.
- Kravchuk, N., Rymar, O., & Bortnik, N. (2023). Spatial planning system in Poland as an example of effective development of territorial communities in Ukraine. Market Economy: Modern Theory and Management Practice, 21(3), 155-169. doi: 10.18524/2413-9998.2022.3(52).275799.
- Lozovska, G., & Znachek, R. (2024). Neuromarketing tools in the promotion of goods and services on social media. Economy and Society, 59. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2024-59-86.
- Ma, X., Feng, X., Fu, D., Tong, J., & Ji, M. (2024). How does the digital economy impact sustainable development? – An empirical study from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, article number 140678. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140079.
- OECD digital government index. (2023). Retrieved from https://goingdigital.oecd.org/en/indicator/58.
- Teslenko, T. (2021). Information (digital) economy as a factor of competitiveness in the conditions of adaptation to changes. Humanities Studies, 8(85), 57-69. doi: 10.26661/hst-2021-8-85-06.
- The digital economy and society index (DESI). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.
- Uber community guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.uber-assets.com/image/upload/v1571164076/legal/doc/ANZ_community_guidelines.pdf.
- UN E-government survey 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024.
- Vărzaru, A.A., & Bocean, C.G. (2024). Digital transformation and innovation: The influence of digital technologies on turnover from innovation activities and types of innovation. Systems, 12(9), article number 359. doi: 10.3390/systems12090359.
- Wang, Q., Guan, H., & Zou, W. (2024). Digital economy development and regional innovation resilience: Mechanism and empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 56(12), 1345-1360. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2379512.
- Xu, J., & Li, W. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on innovation: New evidence from panel threshold model. Sustainability, 14(22), article number 15028. doi: 10.3390/su142215028.
- Yevtushenko, O. (2024). Digitalization: A tool for modernization of public administration in Ukraine. Public Administration and Regional Development, 26, 1158-1176. doi: 10.34132/pard2024.26.03.
- Yushkevych, O., Sharko, V., Stavroiani, S., Makatora, D., & Yevtushenko, Y. (2024). Innovative development of economic systems in the digitalization condition. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 46(1), 23-30. doi: 10.15544/mts.2024.03.