Received 25.03.2022, Revised 28.06.2022, Accepted 30.08.2022

Organizational and structural conditions for the development of creativity potential in the competitiveness management system of industrial corporations

Galyna Krasovska, Valentyna Stadnyk, Ihor Mychalchuk

The article specifies the main directions of innovative changes in business models and business processes of domestic industrial corporations in order to preserve their ability to enter global chains of consumer value creation during the recovery period. According to modern views on the significance of individual components of intellectual capital in the formation of the competitiveness of business entities, creativity is highlighted in their totality, the author's interpretation of the potential of creativity is proposed, and its place in the management system of the competitiveness of an industrial company is determined. The creativity potential of an economic organization is proposed to be considered as its ability to accumulate the necessary amount of intellectual resources for generating creative (non-standard) ideas sufficient for the formation of an effective business model of economic activity in the current and strategically forecasted business environment, while showing creativity in the development of structural capital and relationship capital. It is argued that the organizational and structural conditions for realizing the creative potential of industrial corporations are radical decentralization of management, which is built on the principles of heterarchical organizational structuring. Based on a comparison of the characteristics of organizational "hierarchy" and "heterarchy", their fundamental differences in management approaches are illustrated. The peculiarities of heterarchy as an effective form of increasing the potential of creativity and forming an environment of active innovative search in the organizational shell of corporate and other integrated structures are highlighted

intellectual capital; structural capital; innovation; environment of creativity; heterarchy; organizational interaction; synergy of diversity
14-25
Krasovska, G., Stadnyk, V., & Mychalchuk, I. (2022). Organizational and structural conditions for the development of creativity potential in the competitiveness management system of industrial corporations. Innovation and Sustainability, 2(3), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.3.14.25

References

[1] Taranenko, I.V. (2013). Modification of the globalization and innovation model of the world economy on the basis of sustainable development: New dimensions of competitiveness. In European vector of economic development (pp. 172-185). Dnipro: Alfred Nobel University.

[2] Zos-Kior, M.V., & Bryzhan, K.O. (2017). Management of enterprise competitiveness in conditions of instability. International Scientific Journal "Internauka". Series: "Economic Sciences", 6, 62-65.

[3] Zaitseva, L.O. (2018). Enterprise competitiveness: Theoretical aspect of management. Starobilsk: State Institution "Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University".

[4] Vakulenko, Yu., Oliіnyk, A. & Gevlenko, O. (2018). System characteristics of management of competitiveness of the enterprise. Agrosvit, 18, 10-15. doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2018.18.10.

[5] Holovchuk, Y., & Pchelianska, G. (2020). Strategies formation pecularities of enterprise competitiveness incrieasing on the basis of innovation devlopment paradigm. Economy and State, 3, 66-70. doi: 10.32702/2306-6806.2020.3.66.

[6] Stadnyk, V., Sokoliuk, G., Goncharuk, A., & Matviiets, O. (2019). Institutional factors of competitiveness and development of the national economy. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System (MDSMES 2019) (pp. 376-380). Atlantis Press. Dordrecht. doi: 10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.71.

[7] Spivak, S. (2020). Management of enterprise competitiveness: Theory, methodology, practice. Ternopil: FOP Palianytsia V.A.

[8] Khrapkina, V.V. (2020). Managing the competitiveness of enterprises. Black Sea Economic Studies, 51, 245-248.

[9] Shulga, M. (2020). Development of directions for increasing the competitiveness of the enterprise. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12, 135-141. doi: 10.37320/2415-3583/12.23.

[10] Berezina, L., Varaksina, E., Oliinyk, А., & Rak, A. (2021). Theoretical and methodological fundamentals of enterprise competitiveness management. Agrosvit, 21-22, 35-42. doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2021.21-22.35.

[11] Porter, M.E. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nation. New York: Free Press.

[12] Stadnyk, V.V., & Zamazii, O.V. (2015). Innovative factors in the system of value-based management of an industrial enterprise. Actual Problems of Economics, 9, 242-249.

[13] Stadnyk, V.V., Sokolyuk, G.O., & Gryzovska, L.O. (2020). Information management in realizing the potential of creativity and diversity of hospitality industry entities. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University. Economic Sciences, 2, 155-160.

[14] Heiets, V.M., Semynozhenko, V.P., & Kvasniuk, B.E. (Eds.). (2007). Strategic challenges of the XXI century to the society and economy of Ukraine. Kyiv: Phoenix.

[15] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Science, technology and innovation. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2005 /ni/ind_rik/ind_u/2002.html.

[16] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Volume of innovative products (goods, services) sold by type of economic activity. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/ni.htm. 

[17] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Volume of industrial products (goods, services) sold by types of economic activity in 2010-2019. Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2013/pr/orp_rik/orp_rik_u.htm.

[18] Hamel, G. & Prahalad, K. (2002). Competing for the future. Creation of markets of tomorrow. Moscow: Olymp-Business. 

[19] Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171-174. 

[20] Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free press.

[21] Azoev, G.L., & Chelenkov, A.P. (2000). Competitive advantages of the firm. Moscow: JSC "Typography "Novosti"".

[22] Stark, D. (2001). Asset ambiguity and the organization of diversity in post-socialist countries. Economic Sociology, 2(2), 115-129.

[23] Fontana, W., & Buss, L.W. (1994). "The arrival of the fittest": Toward a theory of biological organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 56(1), 1-64. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(05)80205-8.

[24] Pysarenko, T.V., Kuranda, T.K., Kvasha, T.K., Musina, L.A., Kochetkova, O.P., Paladchenko, O.F., Molchanova, I.V., Gavrys, T.V., & Osadcha, A.B. (2021). The state of research and innovation in Ukraine in 2020. Kyiv: UkrISTEI. 

[25] Stadnyk, V.V. (2015). Hierarchy as an organizational shell of effective interaction of diversity in ensuring the competitiveness of modern corporations. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 6, 132-137.