Received 16.09.2022, Revised 19.12.2022, Accepted 28.02.2023

Development of project management standards: International experience

Yevhenii Rudnichenko, Nataliia Havlovska, Mykhail Kryvdyk, Dmitro Balabus

The article examines the main international standards for quality management and configuration management in projects. The most widespread standards were analyzed, namely: PMBOK (A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge) – a body of knowledge on project management, developed by the Project Management Institute (PMI); ISO standards (ISO 10006:1997 Quality management – Guidelines to quality in project management – standard for quality in project management, ISO 21500:2012 Guidance on project management – standard for project management, ISO 21500:2021 Project, program and portfolio management – Context and concepts – the main profile standard, which is a comprehensive guide to the use of the ISO 21500 series of standards); Prince 2 and PRINCE 2 Agile – a standard method of effective project management developed by the CCTA (Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency); IPMA - standards of the International Project Management Association. International Project Management Association; OPM 3 (Organization Project Management Maturity Model) – a model of Organizational Project Management Maturity; P2M (from Project and Program Management for Enterprise Innovation) is a Japanese approach to managing complex projects of implementing innovative technologies at the enterprise level in an unstable environment. An analysis of the evolution of PMBOK international standards from the 1st edition of 1996 to the 7th edition of 2021 was carried out, which was characterized in detail and presented the relationship between project management principles and areas of project effectiveness according to PMBOK 7th edition. ISO standards are considered and the main ones related to project management are characterized. The standard method of effective management of Prince 2 and PRINCE 2 Agile projects is studied and the main principles on which they are based are given. The main evolutionary transformations of the IPMA standard from 1965 to 2015 are characterized. Appropriate conclusions have been drawn

project; project management standard; PMBOK; ISO; Prince 2; IPMA; OPM 3; P2M
133-139
Rudnichenko, Ye., Havlovska, N., Kryvdyk, M., & Balabus, D. (2023). Development of project management standards: International experience. Innovation and Sustainability, 3(1), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.133.139

References

[1] Havlovska, N., & Rudnichenko, Ye. (2016). Innovation project management. Khmelnytskyi: KHMNU.

[2] Rudnichenko, Ye., Havlovska, N., Sarafyniuk, Ya., & Kryvdyk, M. (2021). Theoretical fundamentals of project management from the position of using modern digital project management tools. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, 6(3), 72-78. doi: 10.36887/2415-8453-2021-3-9.

[3] Official website of the IPMA. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ipma.world/about-us/.

[4] PMBOK 7th Edition PDF Download. (2020). Retrieved from https://knowdemia.com/ebook/pmbok-latest-edition-pdf/.

[5] Crawford, L.H. (2001). Towards global project management standards. In Proceedings of the International Project Management Congress. Project Management Development in the Asia-Pacific Region in the New Century 2001 (pp. 36).: Tokyo: ENAA, JPMF.

[6] ISO 21500. (2012). Guidance on project management. Retrieved from https://www.isopm.ru/download/iso_21500.pdf.

[7] Jugdev, K., & Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19-31. doi: 10.1177/875697280503600403.

[8] Turner, R., Huemann, M., & Keegan, A. (2008). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: The roles of project managers, line managers, and HRM managers. In PMI® research conference: Defining the future of project management (pp. 2-6). Warsaw: Project Management Institute.