Received 26.09.2022, Revised 24.01.2023, Accepted 28.02.2023

Key directions of research and dilemmas in the sphere of public procurement: Theoretical framework

Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Yuryi Chaprak

The work summarizes scientific approaches to the phenomenon of public procurement from the positions of various schools and currents, analyzes the key dilemmas that arise in the process of functioning of the public procurement system of various countries of the world. It is well-founded that problems in the study of public procurement arise due to a number of factors: poor definition of the subject of public procurement, as its boundaries are “blurred” between many academic disciplines; the existence of a “gap” between academic works on the socio-economic consequences of public procurement and the framework sequence of their construction and execution procedure; insufficient interest in studying public procurement on the part of regional and local authorities. The analysis of public procurement research was carried out in several areas: 1) procurement selection methods; 2) attributes of goods and services; 3) participants’ experience; 4) decentralization of purchases; 5) accountability and transparency; 6) efficiency; 7) evaluation of procurement policy. The key dilemmas in the public procurement system are analyzed, among which the following are highlighted: 1) the accountability / responsibility dilemma: developing flexible procurement systems while maintaining accountability and control; 2) the fraud / red tape dilemma: limit the opportunity for fraud / mismanagement while reducing operational constraints; 3) the principle / agent dilemma: identifying “best value” in the presence of competing goals and common agency; 4) short-term / long-term cost dilemma: shortterm economic efficiency vs. long-term monitoring costs; 5) the cost of empowerment dilemma: responsiveness to “end user” through decentralization while increasing training and evaluation costs. In the long term, reforms aimed at improving procedures and increasing the adaptive potential of the public procurement system are critically important

public procurement; principal; agent; dilemma; accountability; transparency
51-63
Dluhopolskyi, О., & Chaprak, Yu. (2023). Key directions of research and dilemmas in the sphere of public procurement: Theoretical framework. Innovation and Sustainability, 3(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.51.63

References

[1] Report on the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union for 2021. (2021). Retrieved from https://eu-ua.kmu.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/euua_report_2021_eng.pdf.

[2] Mykhailyk, R. (2022). Public procurement in the light of the European integration of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakupki.com.ua/publichni-zakupivli-u-svitli-yevropejskoyi-integratsiyi-ukrayiny.html.

[3] Kornilyuk, R., & Volokh, K. (2018). Public procurement: The ProZorro effect. Price trends of product groups in 2013-2017. Dnipro: Serednyak T.K.

[4] Bugay, Yu. (2016). ProZorro: How a volunteer project led to nation-wide procurement reform in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.open-contracting.org/2016/07/28/prozorro-volunteer-project-led-nation-wide-procurement-reform-ukraine/.

[5] Dluhopolskyi, O.V., & Vasylkova, Y.V. (2021). ProZorro: Challenges for digitization of public expenditures in Ukraine. Black sea economic studies, 71, 63-68. doi: 10.32843/bses.71-9.

[6] Dluhopolskyi, O.V., & Vasylkova, Y.V. (2022). Electronic public procurement in the state economy management system. In Theory and practice of management: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference (pp. 150-152).

[7] Dluhopolskyi, O.V., Zaklekta, O.I., & Romanyshin, A.A. (2019). ProZorro as a tool for ensuring market transparency. Black sea economic studies, 48(1), 90-97. doi: 10.32843/bses.48-15.

[8] Shulika, A. (2022). Procurement without ProZorro: Myth or reality? Retrieved from https://eba.com.ua/en/zakupivli-bez-prozorromif-chy-realnist.

[9] Datsenko, V. (2022). Rebuilding with(out) ProZorro: How to conduct procurement so that there are no questions? Retrieved from   https://ti-ukraine.org/en/blogs/rebuilding-with-out-prozorro-how-to-conduct-procurement-so-that-there-are-no-questions/.

[10] Kolisnichenko, V. (2022). The Verkhovna Rada adopted a generally updated law on privatization. Retrieved from https://gmk.center/en/news/the-verkhovna-rada-adopted-a-generally-updated-law-on-privatization/.

[11] Thai, K.V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9-50. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-01-01-2001-B001.

[12] Tremblay, P., & Boyle, A. (2018). Report: Literature on public procurement for regions: Theories, evidence and implications for regional Australia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364694269_Report_Literature_on_public_procurement_for_regions_Theories_evidence_and_implications_for_regional_Australia.

[13] OECD. (2011). What are the public procurement procedures and when can they be used? SIGMA Public Procurement Briefs, 10, 1-11. doi: 10.1787/23109246.

[14] Holmes, G. (1995). To tender or to negotiate: The buyers dilemma. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 1(3), 7-17.

[15] Martin, L.L. (2002). Performance-based contracting for human services: Lessons for public procurement? Journal of Public Procurement, 2(1), 55-71.

[16] Shetterly, D. (2002). Contracting for public bus transit: Do techniques employed make a difference in service outcome? Journal of Public Procurement, 2(1), 73-92. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-02-01-2002-B003.

[17] Snider, K.F., & Walkner, M.F. (2001). Best practices and protests: Toward effective use of past performance as criterion in source selections. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 96-122.

[18] Clipsham, N. (1998). Appraising performance appraisal systems. The Miltary Engineer, 591, 31-32.

[19] McCue, C., & Gianakis, G. (2001). Public purchasing: Who's minding the store? Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 71-95. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-01-01-2001-B002.

[20] McCue, C., & Pitzer, J.T. (2000). Centralized vs. decentralized purchasing: Current trends in governmental procurement practices. Journal of Public Budgeting, 12(3), 400-420. doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-12-03-2000-B003.

[21] Pegnato, J.A. (2003). Assessing federal procurement reform: Has the procurement pendulum stopped swinging? Journal of Public Procurement, 3(2), 145-175.

[22] Muller, E.W. (1994). Job analysis comparing the tasks in state/local government purchasing and institutional purchasing. Tempe: Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies.

[23] Georgieva, I. (2017). Infringements in procurement procedures. Corruption loopholes and practices. In using transparency against corruption in public procurement. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

[24] Fox, D., & Morris, J. (2015). The role of accountability in federal acquisition: A search for context. Journal of Public Procurement, 15(4), 514-536. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-15-04-2015-B005.

[25] Coppier, R., & Piga, G. (2007). Why do transparent public procurement and corruption go hand in hand? In G. Piga & K.V. Thai (Eds.), The economics of public procurement (pp. 183-199). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

[26] Mubangizi, J., & Sewpersadh, P. (2017). A human rights-based approach to combating public procurement corruption in Africa. African Journal of Legal Studies, 10(1), 66-90. doi: 10.1163/17087384-12340015.

[27] Schapper, P.R., Malta, J.N., & Gilbert, D.L. (2006). An analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 6(1-2), 1-26. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-06-01-02-2006-B001.

[28] Report of the National Performance Review. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Washington: US Government Printing Office.

[29] Apaza, C. (2007). Public management challenge: Ensuring accountability and controlling corruption. The Public Purpose, 3(4), 45-60.

[30] Bradshaw, J., & Chang, S. (2013). Past performance as an indicator of future performance: Selecting an industry partner to maximise the probability of program success. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 20(1), 49-69.

[31] Halushchak, M. (2011). Public procurement in Ukraine: Theoretical aspects and practical problems. Galician Economic Herald. Series: Economics and management of the national economy, 1(30), 43-53.

[32] Certification training course “Specialist in public procurement” under martial law conditions. (2023). Retrieved from https://kse.ua/ua/kse-program/fahivets-z-publichnih-zakupivel/.

[33] Matthews, D. (2005). Strategic procurement in the public sector: A mask for financial and administrative policy. Journal of Public Procurement, 5(3), 388-399. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-05-03-2005-B005.

[34] Stewart, J. (1994). The lie of the level playing field. Melbourne: Text Publishing Company.

[35] Knight, L., Caldwell, N., Harland, C., & Telgen, J. (2003). Government reform and public procurement. Retrieved from https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/210003995/Knight2003government.pdf.

[36] Knight, L., Harland, C., Telgren, J., Thai, K., Callendar, G., & McKen, K. (Eds.). (2007). Public procurement: International cases and commentary. London: Routledge.

[37] Ivanov, O. (2022). Procurement during full-scale war. Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/zakupivli-pid-chas-povnomasshtabnoyi-vijny.

[38] McCue, C.P., Prier, E., & Swanson, D. (2015). Five dilemmas in public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 15(2), 177-207. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-15-02-2015-B003.

[39] Johnson, P.F., Leenders, M.R., & McCue, C. (2003). A comparison of purchasing's organisational roles and responsibilities in the public and private sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 3(1), 57-74. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-03-01-2003-B003.

[40] Dluhopolskyi, O., Farion-Melnyk, A., Bilous, I., Moskaliuk, N., & Banakh, S. (2021). Strategic directions to overcoming corruption: Financial and legal perspectives. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(36), 481-495. doi: 10.18371/fcaptp.v1i36.228096.

[41] Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J.M. (2007). Policing politicians: Citizen empowerment and political accountability in Uganda. London: The International Growth Centre (IGC).

[42] Appleby, P.H. (1947). Toward Better Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 7(2), 93-99.

[43] Lupia, A. (2001). Delegation of power: Agency theory. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 3375-3377). doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01129-3.

[44] Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice, 33(4), 27-43.

[45] Hettne, J. (2013). Sustainable public procurement and the single market – is there a conflict of interest? European Procurement and Public Private Partnerships Law Review, 8(1), 31-40. doi: 10.21552/EPPPL/2013/1/160.

[46] Cox, M.F. (2008). Supply chain compliance. In A. Tarantino (Ed.), Governance, risk and compliance handbook: Technology, finance, environmental and international guidance and best practices (507-529). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

[47] Schiele, J.J., & McCue, C.P. (2010). A framework for the adoption of lean thinking with public procurement. International Journal of Procurement Management, 3(4), 379-396. doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2010.035468.

[48] Olken, B.A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200-249. doi: 10.1086/517935.

[49] Meier, K. (1980). Executive reorganisation of government: Impact on employment and expenditures. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 396-412.

[50] Salamon, L.M. (1981). The question of goals: Why reorganisation should serve policy rather than administrative goals. In P. Szanton (Ed.), Federal reorganisation: What have we learned? Chatham: Chatham House.

[51] Sanchez, A. (2013). The role of procurement. In R. Allen (Ed.), The international handbook of public financial management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.