Received 15.10.2025, Revised 17.02.2026, Accepted 26.03.2026 Published 06.04.2026

Ambition without acceleration: The European Green Deal and environmental SDG performance

Oksana Liashenko, Olga Demianiuk

Achieving environmental Sustainable Development Goals is a central priority of global climate policy, yet whether ambitious regulatory frameworks translate into measurable acceleration of environmental progress remains empirically underexplored due to the lack of causal identification designs. The purpose of this study was to assess the causal impact of the European Green Deal on the trajectories of four environmental SDGs in EU-27 member states relative to non-EU European countries. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences framework was applied to a balanced panel of 39 European countries over the period 2010-2023, incorporating two-way country and year fixed effects, country-clustered standard errors, and a set of time-varying controls. It was established that during 2020-2023 the European Green Deal did not generate statistically significant improvements in SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), or SDG 13 (Climate Action) relative to the control group. A marginally significant deterioration was identified for SDG 15 (Life on Land), indicating a relative short-run decline in biodiversity indicators within the EU. Heterogeneity analysis revealed that newer member states and lower-income countries experienced significantly worse climate-action outcomes. The robustness of the findings was confirmed through placebo tests, alternative control-group specifications, and COVID-19 sensitivity analysis. The results can inform climatepolicy practitioners and public administrators seeking to strengthen implementation mechanisms and financing for the biodiversity and land-use components of EU policy

policy impact evaluation; difference-in-differences; panel data; environmental performance; implementation gap; quasi-experiment; fixed effects
55-66
Liashenko, O., & Demianiuk, O. (2026). Ambition without acceleration: The European Green Deal and environmental SDG performance. Innovation and Sustainability, 6(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.31649/vis/1.2026.55

References

  1. Angrist, J.D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
  2. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249-275. doi: 10.1162/003355304772839588.
  3. Bongardt, A., & Torres, F. (2022). The European Green Deal: More than an exit strategy to the pandemic crisis, a building block of a sustainable European economic model. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), 170-185. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13264.
  4. Brodny, J., Tutak, M., & Grebski, W.W. (2025). Empirical evaluation of the energy transition efficiency in the EU-27 countries over a decade – a non-obvious perspective. Energies, 18(13), article number 3367. doi: 10.3390/en18133367.
  5. da Silva Hyldmo, H., Rye, S.A., & Vela-Almeida, D. (2024). A globally just and inclusive transition? Questioning policy representations of the European Green Deal. Global Environmental Change, 89, article number 102946. doi: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2024.102946.
  6. European Commission. (2021). ‘Fit for 55’: Delivering the EU’s 2030 climate target on the way to climate neutrality. COM(2021) 550 final. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0550.
  7. Friedlingstein, P., et al. (2024). Global carbon budget 2024. Earth System Science Data, 16(6), 2563-2648. doi: 10.18160/ GCP-2024.
  8. Hereu-Morales, J., Segarra, A., & Valderrama, C. (2024). The European (Green?) Deal: A systematic analysis of environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 32(1), 647-661. doi: 10.1002/sd.2671.
  9. Jones, M.W., Peters, G.P., Gasser, T., Andrew, R.M., Schwingshackl, C., Gütschow, J., Houghton, R.A., Friedlingstein, P., Pongratz, J., & Le Quéré, C. (2023). National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850. Scientific Data, 10, article number 155. doi: 10.1038/s41597-02302041-1.
  10. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and 2024 update (Policy research working paper No. 10952). Washington: World Bank. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-10952.
  11. Koundouri, P., Alamanos, A., Plataniotis, A., Stavridis, C., Perifanos, K., & Devves, S. (2024). Assessing the sustainability of the European Green Deal and its interlinkages with the SDGs. NPJ Climate Action, 3, article number 23. doi: 10.1038/s44168-024-00104-6.
  12. Lafortune, G., & Fuller, G. (2025). Europe sustainable development report 2025: SDG priorities for the new EU leadership. Paris: SDSN.
  13. Liashenko, O., & Demianiuk, O. (2026). Ambition without acceleration: The European Green Deal and environmental SDG performance – supplementary files. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18609249.
  14. Liashenko, O., Pavlov, K., Pavlova, O., Demianiuk, O., Chmura, R., Sowa, B., & Vlasenko, T. (2026). Policy plateau and structural regime shift: Hybrid forecasting of the EU decarbonisation gap toward 2030 targets. Sustainability, 18(2), article number 1114. doi: 10.3390/su18021114.
  15. Ottomano Palmisano, G., Rocchi, L., Negri, L., & Piscitelli, L. (2025). Evaluating the progress of EU countries towards the implementation of the European Green Deal: A multiple-criteria approach. Land, 14(1), article number 141. doi: 10.3390/land14010141.
  16. Pavlova, O., Liashenko, O., Pavlov, K., Rutkowski, M., Kornatka, A., Vlasenko, T., & Halei, M. (2025). Discourse vs. decarbonisation: Tracking the alignment between EU climate rhetoric and national energy patterns. Energies, 18(19), article number 5304. doi: 10.3390/en18195304.
  17. Pisani-Ferry, J., & Tagliapietra, S. (2024). An investment strategy to keep the European Green Deal on track. Bruegel Policy Brief, 31.
  18. Pollex, J., & Lenschow, A. (2025). When talk meets actions – return to commission leadership in EU environmental policy-making with the European Green Deal. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(9), 2197-2222. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2024.2402866.
  19. Roth, J. (2022). Pretest with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends. American Economic Review, 4(3), 305-322. doi: 10.1257/aeri.20210236.
  20. Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P.H.C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218-2244. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008.
  21. Sachs, J.D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Iablonovski, G. (2025). Financing sustainable development to 2030 and midcentury. Sustainable development report 2025. Paris: SDSN. doi: 10.25546/111909.
  22. Stockholm Environment Institute. (2025). EU green policy tracker. Retrieved from https://www.sei.org/tools/eugreen-policy-tracker/.
  23. Vrolijk, K., & Sato, M. (2023). Quasi-experimental evidence on carbon pricing. The World Bank Research Observer, 38(2), 213-248. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkad001.
  24. World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/.