Received 10.06.2021, Revised 31.08.2021, Accepted 24.11.2021

Diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anti-crisis management policy conditions

Svitlana Yermak

The author's approach to diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anti-crisis management policy conditions is offered in the article. The main approaches to the sequence of assessment of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures are summarized and the key aspects that reveal the modern methodological tools of this process are identified. The author's vision of the stages of diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anticrisis management policy conditions (1) methodological support of the diagnostic process; 2) information support; 3) development of a comprehensive integrated indicator; 4) the assessment process; 5) development of anti-crisis measures) is formed. The main methodological approaches to the selection of the components of the systems for assessment of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures are systematized and the following are distinguished: functional approach, modified-functional, resource, resource-functional and other approach. The basic requirements which the system of indicators of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures should satisfy are defined. It is proposed to build a system of indicators on the principle of dualism and to distinguish two parts: general and special. It is proved that the indicators of the general part should be based on the basic principles of anti-crisis management and priorities of inclusive economic development and be divided into social, economic, environmental, scientific, technical and organizational blocks. Indicators of the special part are aimed at diagnosing specific industry and structural features of business structures. Based on the proposed system of indicators, it is advisable to form a comprehensive integrated indicator that will determine the level of the innovative activity effectiveness of business structures (low, medium, high) and develop a set of anti-crisis measures to improve it and meet the main priorities of inclusive economic development and social responsibility of innovators

diagnostics; innovative activity; business structures; anti-crisis management
28-39
Yermak, S. (2021). Diagnostics of innovative activity effectiveness of business structures at the implementation of anti-crisis management policy conditions. Innovation and Sustainability, 1(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2021.1.28.39

References

[1] Volkov, O.I., Denysenko, M.P., Grechan, A.P., Beltyukov, E.O., & Ilyashenko, S.M. (2004). Economics and organisation of innovation activity. Kyiv: Publishing House VD Professional.

[2] Chorna, M.V., & Glukhova, S.V. (2012). Assessment of the effectiveness of innovation activities of enterprises. Kharkiv: Kharkiv State University of Food Technology and Trade.

[3] Koyuda, V.A., & Lysenko, L.A. (2010). Innovation activity of the enterprise and assessment of its effectiveness. Kharkiv: INZHEK Publishing House.

[4] Mykytiuk, P.P. (2007). Analysing the impact of investments and innovations on the efficiency of an enterprise. Ternopil: Economic opinion of TNEU.

[5] Grytsulenko, S.I. (2016). Assessment of innovative activities as instrument of innovative polici of economic system. Effective Economy, 3.

[6] Khariv, P.S. (2003). Innovative activity of the enterprise and economic assessment of innovation processes. Ternopil: Economic Thought.

[7] Ischeykin, T.E. (2011). Methodical approaches to assessing the innovative development of trade enterprises. Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, 5(50), 259-267.

[8] Chernov, V.A. (2004). Analyses of innovative activity in trade. Audit and Financial Analysis, 1, 46-49.

[9] Trifilova, A.A. (2005). Estimation of efficiency of innovative development of the enterprise. Moscow: Finance and Statistics. 

[10] Ilysheva, N.N., & Ilyshev, A.M. (2004). System of analytical indicators of innovative activity of the organisation. Quality. Innovations. Education, 2, 6-30.

[11] Methodological recommendations for tracking the dynamics of key economic indicators of strategically important enterprises and monopoly enterprises (based on individual monitoring of enterprises). (2004). Retrieved from https://me.gov.ua/Documents/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=d17a941b-b565-4fe8-baa7-73612e44e36f&title=MetodichniRekomendatsiiSchodoVidslidkuvanniaDinamikiOsnovnikhEkonomichnikhPokaznikivRobotiStrategichnoVazhlivikhPidpriiemstvIPidpriiemstv-monopolistiv-naOsnoviIndividualnogoMonitoringuPidpriiemstv.

[12] Hadzevych, O.I., & Matviichuk, I.O. (2017). The method of analysis and evaluation of innovative activity of the enterprise. Lutsk: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University.

[13] Voloshchuk, L.O., Kirsanova, V.V., & Filippova, S.V. (2014). Analytical tools for managing the innovative development of an industrial enterprise. Odesa: Pluton.

[14] Voloshchuk, L.O. (2014). Innovative development of an industrial enterprise: the essence and problems of analytical support in the conditions of indicative management. Business Inform, 11, 75-79.

[15] Kadol, L.V. (2016). Peculiarities of complex assessment of the effectiveness of innovation activity of the enterprise. Global and National Economic Issues, 10, 359-363.

[16] Koyuda, P.N., & Sheyko, I.A. (2013). Effectiveness of innovation activity of enterprises: Theory and practice. Kharkiv:Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics.

[17] Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak, S., & Nosova, T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1-11. doi: 10.3846/btp.2021.13273.

[18] Pererva, P.G., & Kosenko, A.P. (2006). Development of methods for assessing the efficiency of using the innovative potential of HEIs. Visnik of the Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 4(98), 178-187.

[19] Zianko, V.V., Yepifanova, I.Yu., & Zianko V.V. (2015). Innovative activity of enterprises and its financial support in the context of transformational changes in the Ukrainian economy. Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[20] Yermak, S.O. (2019). Theoretical and methodological basis of strategic management of inclusive development of enterprises innovative activity. Schweinfurt: Time Realities Scientific Group UG (haftungsbeschrankt).

[21] Yermak, S.O. (2017). Problems of innovative activity development at food industry enterprises of Ukraine. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 21, 96-102.

[22] Malyuta, L. (2011). Assessment level of innovation development of industrial enterprises. Socio-Economic Problems and the State, 1(4).

[23] Dzhedzhula, V.V., Yepifanova, I.Yu., & Tsvyk, O.G. (2017). Innovative activity as a factor of competitiveness of enterprise. Investments: Practice and Experience, 4, 5-8.

[24] Demchenko, G.V. (2016). Development of an assessment model and a system of indicators for organisational support for the activation of innovation activity. Uzhorod National University Herald. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, 9, 42-45.

[25] Gustynskyi, M.O. (2011). Methodological principles of evaluation of the effectiveness of innovation activity in the sectors of the national economy. Scientific Works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Series: Economic Sciences, 2(1), 88-92.

[26] Filyppova, S., Bashynska, I., Kholod, B., Prodanova, L., Ivanchenkova, L., & Ivanchenkov, V. (2019). Risk management through systematization: Risk management culture.  International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3),  6047-6052. doi: 10.35940/ijrte.C5601.098319.

[27] Bashynska I.O. (2019). SMART-approach to determining of smartization goals of industrial enterprise. Scientific Notes of Vernadsky Kyiv Polytechnic National University. Series: Economics and Management, 30(69)5, 41-46.